<link rel="stylesheet" href="//fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%3A400italic%2C700italic%2C400%2C700">D-Company Archives « Aam JanataSkip to content

An AIMIM worker has updated that MLA Waris Pathan and the MIM workers team took murdered Yakub Abdul Hasan's family to the offices of Toyota and met the General Manager to submit a memorandum with several demands. Specifically stating that Yakub being murdered while on duty and by employees of the company, in a conspiracy and cover up, the company should compensate his family who have lost a bread winner. The AIMIM political activists also raised slogans with their demands and condemning the crime. They demanded that all the participants to conspire in his murder be arrested (currently only one Santosh Arekar has been arrested, while it is obvious that one person could not have overpowered him to commit the act).

ACP Sankhe to the scene and a bandobast of about a hundred policemen arrived on the scene and ACP Madhukar Sankhe personally assured MLA Waris Pathan that all the accused would be arrested and an inquiry would be conducted again. Copies of the memorandum were also submitted to the Kala Chowki Police station and Police Commissioner Ahmed Javed with a demand for a proper investigation to be carried out and culprits to be brought to book.

The text of the memorandum which is on the official letterhead of MLA Waris Pathan, is as follows:

Ref No: BAWP/10/15/229
Date: 13th October 2015

To,
The General manager,
Shinrai Toyota
Sewree, Mumbai

Subject :- Murder Of Yakub Abdul Hassan Shaikh

Dear Sir,

It has been brought to our notice that Mr. Yakub Abdul Hasan Shaikh, one of your employees was murdered by his colleagues in your premises while he was on duty. This is very unfortunate.

Even after such a serious and unfortunate incidence in your premises, it has been noted that you have not taken the matter seriously and no enquiries have been initiated from your side nor have you taken any action against the main culprits for reasons best known to you.

The family of the diseased has approached us for justice and we demand strong action against the main culprits. Since you have CCTV installed in the premises, you definitely would be in the position to find the people involved in the heinous crime and also how actually it was committed. It si very obvious from the nature of the crime that no person can commit this type of act single handedly, but so far only one person has been arrested and a case has been filed against him but why is the company shielding other culprits? Why are others not being charged or arrested? These are certain questions which remain unanswered. The answer to these questions are very important for the family and for all humanity. As only after complete enquiry and action would the family be satisfied and they would feel that justice has been given to them.

Hence, we demand that a complete enquiry should be initiated by you to find the actual cause of the crime, nail all the culprits involved and take strong action against them besides being removed from service, you must file a strong police complaint against them, so that other employees would never think of indulging uin such acts.

Since the deceased was the only earning member of the family and now with his sudden demise the family is left with nothing but poverty, hence we demand full compensation for the family as the deceased was on duty when he was brutally murdered by his colleagues in the company premises.

Hope you will do the needful and oblige.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Adv. Waris Pathan
C.C.
1. Commissioner of Police Mumbai
2. Sr. Police Inspector, Kalachowky Police Station

All extremely reasonable and necessary demands, which I hope the police carry out with full responsibility and are endorsed by other politicians and citizens alike for a safe Mumbai.

AIMIM Memorandum to the General Manager of Toyota
AIMIM Memorandum to the General Manager of Toyota
AIMIM Memorandum to the General Manager of Toyota
AIMIM Memorandum to the General Manager of Toyota

There is this niggling thing about the 1993 blasts case that just does not add up. We have Yakub's "confession". We have hanged him. We have evidence about Tiger Memon running the show on the 1993 blasts - manpower, materials, location, the works. What evidence is there against Dawood is not clear to my inexperienced eye. I have not come across anything. Every single interview of Dawood and Chhota Shakeel categorically state that they were framed and completely not involved with the blasts, even in interviews where they claim other crimes with chilling candour "uska kaam kar denge" "ha ha humne hi kya na" "hum smuggling aur gang war karte hain" etc - not the slightest deviation in over a decade. And they have slipped in other places, so rehearsed cunning seems difficult to credit over so long a term. For example, while Chhota Shakeel denied involvement with the IPL, the interviewer successfully used it to goad him into revealing reasons for attempting to kill Lalit .

If there was evidence against Dawood, I doubt that the TV channel research teams would not find it or that the interviewer would not throw it in his face to provoke him further. Still, I understand how Dawood being the bigger don whom Tiger worked for can be presumed to be involved, anyway. And he most certainly left a bloody trail in that got things so hot for him that he had to leave for Dubai well before the blasts - so his killing people in a fit of anger over Babri Masjid is hardly something that cannot be believed. And of course it is believable that the slip ups in the interviews were just a calculated foil for making the denials believable - one thing to confess to attempting to kill gangsters and smuggling money, quite another to admit you killed innocents wholesale in a city where you do "business" (their euphemism for underworld activities).

What is difficult to comprehend is how is how we have reached this point where we hanged someone who *claimed* to be innocent and working to expose the ever since he found out about it and arranged for more accused to return to the country - regardless of whether originally captured or surrendered. I accept that is hardly going to confess that he is guilty (which too many criminals do), but it is less difficult to understand why he would let evidence against himself survive at all - regardless of whether he was surrendering to India or just in the habit of roaming around with proofs on terror attacks. More importantly, even the conviction sees him at best involved with the finances and tickets. 1993 was supposedly Pakistan ISI's first on Indian soil. It is unclear how providing tickets to go to Pakistan implies the person buying the tickets knew what they would be used for. Still, let us say he knowingly did it and was guilty and rightly hanged. Or at the very least knew of it and did not prevent a crime of this magnitude. Complete benefit of any doubt. He's dead anyway. Guilty unless proved innocent beyond doubt makes no difference now.

Over the last few weeks, I have been going through hundreds of articles of coverage of this case. Old ones, new ones, whatever. There is hardly anything on Tiger Memon beyond the confessions of Yakub Memon, and as a mention in articles on after the first year or two when Yakub's confessions were hot. Now this is the man whom we actually have evidence against. And there is this massive silence on him. No particular chases by our intelligence agencies mentioned. No questions in Parliament about his whereabouts, the person who provided concrete proof against him hanged, while his people who planted bombs get life. Dawood is India's most wanted because of the 1993 blasts apparently, yet the person against whom we have concrete proof is never a topic of hot debate. Even our tug of war with Pakistan is over Dawood.

Ajit Doval is fixated on Dawood, as is the state - successive governments, not just Modi. Yakub's hanging comes on the heels of the first attempt on Chhota Rajan's life by Chhota Shakeel since a decade ago in Bangkok. Yet no one seems to have bothered to ask so much as whether Tiger Memon is dead or alive.

Makes one wonder what is going on. Power in India is often seen as silence on crimes and silencing of witnesses. There is no information of crimes of Tiger Memon before or after the 1993 blasts beyond "member of " and the person who is prime witness against him in 1993 blasts is hanged by the state and the state itself has not pursued him with any visible urgency. There isn't so much as a photo beyond 400 pixels and a decade old in the public domain for the person with most evidence against him in the 1993 blasts that have put India on an decades long international manhunt.

Cannot help but speculate whether Tiger Memon is the man who knows too many powerful people in India to be ever allowed to come on the radar.

4

So was finally hanged this morning. The did a dramatic early morning hearing to hear the challenge to the President's rejection of Yakub Memon's mercy petition, and Yakub lost the case.

Even if he had won it, it would have won him at best 14 more days to live. Perhaps some new trick could be pulled out of some hat and he would live for the rest of his life in jail was the hope.

He lost the petition.

There are many arguments in his favor, many against him. I myself was of the view that is an irreversible thing. While there is any redeeming factor, a death penalty seems obscene. I am no legal eagle. If someone seems polite and constructive in , that is redeeming enough for me. I hold no eagerness for the life and death of another to rest on my conscience - however evil. I have no revenge gene. That he could not do more harm was good enough for me.

Regardless of my views, it is the Supreme Court that decided and whether it was a melodramatic thing that could have been avoided with a stay and more leisurely process or not, is all a postmortem of a dead thing. So are other arguments. They will not bring him back. They will certainly feed a justified, but toxic sense of persecution among Muslims.

And they achieve nothing constructive. While the death penalty exists, it will be awarded. How often or not is immaterial. If our whole system is prejudiced against Muslims, it will reflect in the sentences and executions as well. The defeat of the death penalty itself was a goal beyond the scope of this case - or indeed every case when we suddenly wake up. It needs to be an independent war.

I am no fan of the . I think it is closet fascist - both in terms of as well as economic view. It is a toxic bunch of opportunists there whose worst sin is not even against those they persecute, but those who repose the most faith in them with expectations they have been led to believe, which are little more than carrots.

I agree that the judiciary itself is swayed by public opinion and has several and severe problems with quality (like every aspect of ). I agree socio-economic conditions are their own bias of availability of opportunities of , and prejudice in who is perceived as innocent or guilty by default more easily than another - which is possibly something that can never be proved without serious behavioral research.

Yet, flawed as it is, there is a need to stop where the system stops. There is a need to pick and choose battles when it comes to . A dead person cannot be brought back, and harping on about the injustice to him serves no purpose beyond creating distress, resentment and potentially rebellion among those who experience themselves as persecuted by association.

This will be more harmful to the vulnerable sections of society than the powerful ones - whether financially, communally or politically. Frustration and anger can take over ones life and set people on paths they would not otherwise choose. Yakub Memon himself would not be hanged if it were not for frustrations over another evil incident leading an entire group of people down a path that ruined their own lives irrevocably as well, beyond the unsuspecting others they killed. Even a big don like , who lived and breathed  can never return to his beloved place of birth again. Uprooted forever. Being a gangster is one thing, being accused of mass slaughter is another. Mumbai is no longer safe for him. He must watch over his shoulder all his life. Know that the people of the city he loves want his head for his actions. There is no coming back. For victims or criminals.

A supremacist majority WANTS minorities to do crimes they can hang them for and counts on prejudices they seed to create an acceptance for their retaliatory crimes as victimhood. We have seen this over and over. There is no fear in bloodlust even though talk of dangers is used to create an aura of threat. Nor do they feel any desperation to avoid loss of life of nameless others on their side beyond their advertizing potential in shaping social prejudices - you need victims for victimhood. It is no coincidence that the second attempt to fell the Babri Masjid succeeded when leaders of the movement killed their own to fuel a frenzy of outraged victimhood. While we still have a modicum of functioning judiciary, fair or not, prejudiced by circumstances or not, it continues to be the best bet of a vulnerable minority.

I do not mean that people who are wronged should shut up and suck it up. I most certainly do not endorse communal domination of any sort.

All I say is that Yakub Memon is dead. I appreciate that he was not killed in secret like Ajmal Kasab or and he and those trying to save his life had the opportunity to fight for it till the end. It is time to take a pause and reorient and seek justice in ways that enrich and empower everyone.

Even if you look at Yakub Memon's case, there is so much hindsight on what was not done adequately to defend him, that now leads to a perception of him not getting a proper chance. Well, there are many Yakub Memons still in prison. Illiterate, poor people from various castes, classes, religions. People condemned to crimes so horrid that they have no choice but to accept whoever the court forces to help them because even with money no one may take their cases. Perhaps the learnings of this defeat can help them. That would help the process of justice as well, if good legal help were available to those who did not have it.

A robustly defended accused makes for a clearer conscience in whatever his end fate is, leaving no doubt that the is understood and argued fully resulting to a punishment as per law. It is in national interest. It is in the interest of god knows how many who end up serving sentences because they have no idea how to defend themselves.

And it need not be for the death penalty alone. Just yesterday, as I was contemplating Yakub Memon's case, I found myself preferring the death penalty over a long drawn imprisonment (I know Yakub got both). How many in India serve entire terms in jail before seeing the inside of a court?

I am aware, that this is easy for me to say, not knowing Yakub Memon in any way or having fought to save him or suffered similar or even experiencing first hand what it means to be a Muslim and have a default perception of guilt when accused. All I am saying is that I do care and I respect a battle well and passionately fought and I believe that it is important for everyone that the Supreme Court word remain final - particularly given that it can no longer be changed.

I think the moment of high drama is when emotions cause extreme stands. To save an accused in a horrendous crime and see the end of justice in it as though we aren't killing innocents daily. To stand outside a jail baying for blood of one who spilled ours, while the ones who planted the bombs got their sentences without a fuss, and they live. A moment of climax focuses everything we feel about a subject on a single outcome.

But sometimes, it is time to step back, breathe and look at the living.

Short, disappointed post just tickled at the irony. In my post "Who profits from hanging Yakub Memon?" I had pointed out that hanging him basically means yet another dead witness in 's grand tradition of dead witnesses against powerful criminals.

Ironically, as the news of the dismissing his curative petition on the day before his hanging is scheduled hit Twitter, two of the top trends were # and #याकूब_को_फांसी_दो.

The savetiger trend is because it is International tiger day today. It is only a supreme and ironic coincidence that the chief accused in the 1993 blasts against whom provided proof that broke the case wide open is nicknamed.... Tiger Memon.

Earlier Yakub had been found medically fit to be killed. A perplexing requirement for a hanging. How does it matter if someone is fit or unfit while being killed?

Since then, the Governor too has refused Yakub's plea.

At 1:52 this afternoon, Majid Memon, a journalist, wrote an article "Yakub Memon: Break the official omerta - In case, state displayed bad faith" about his perceptions about the case and how he had helped verify information Yakub Memon had got with him about the residences of , Tiger Memon and another smuggler, Taufiq Jallianwala, whom the had not known of before. He described videos Yakub had made of their residences, and chaperoning provided by the ISI in Karachi, Bangkok and Karachi again. He described audio recorded by him of Tiger Memon with his associates.

He says that the Narsimharao betrayed Yakub Memon due to increasing pressure about being soft on terror and that the various officials - not just of intelligence agencies, but diplomats as well were silent because of a top down omerta and should be granted amnesty from the charge of contempt of court, if they are to testify - B Raman too had hesitated for this reason, as per him.

By 6:04pm, has published an article with statements from CBI officers that deny these claims. Shantanu Sen, who led the operation on the CBI end claims they knew there were differences in the Memon family over the blasts and some of them wanted to return to as they were not happy in Pakistan. He denies that any deal had been struck and that they nabbed Yakub in Kathmandu. He denied that Yakub Memon had been duped and points out that of the 11 family members who came to India, only four got sentenced. His parents got bail and charges against them would be dropped had the matter come to prosecution before they died.

Mr Chattwal, who had been named by Yakub's ex-lawyer as the CBI contact who told them to get bail and later betrayed them, said that he had received no such instructions and that Yakub had not cooperated with the investigation, but that the evidence was recovered from him at the time of the arrest.

A few days earlier, Ujjwal Nikam, the public prosecutor claimed not to know of the mitigating circumstances B Raman wrote of at all.

One possibility is that there is an evil conspiracy on hand, etc etc.

Is the other explanation more simple?

Is this yet another horrendous example of lack of communication between investigating and intelligence agencies? B Raman who headed Pakistan desk of R&AW and oversaw the arrest clearly saw mitigating circumstances. Shantanu Sen who led the CBI investigation was clearly aware of cooperation as his claim of Yakub Memon not being duped demonstrates (if there was no deal, where would a question of duping arise?). On the other hand, Chattwal, who apparently was the CBI guy at the courts end was not aware of any deal and believes the evidence to have been recovered from Yakub at the time of his arrest. Ujjwal Nikam, public prosecutor who asked for the penalty is not aware of any mitigating circumstances at all.

That there was some deal does not take rocket science to understand. If Yakub Memon was not cooperating and had been arrested and evidence against himself recovered, why would he call his family to India? Morever, if Yakub Memon had any evidence proving his own guilt, why in the world would he carry it at all, when he knows the documents he carries will go to Indian authorities? The idea is he came to India expecting justice and mercy for cooperation, not proving own guilt, right?

The 30th approaches and this story only gets murkier.