Skip to content

3

Atishi Marlena wrote a letter to Prashant Bhushan pretty much declaring a parting of ways and in the grand tradition of Aam Aadmi Party, the letter is in public domain. Several of Arvind Kejriwal's supporters have been demanding that I comment on it. Presumably because they think it is a pro-Kejriwal letter or something.

Here are my thoughts on the letter.

Prashant Bhushan refused to compromise with the Kejriwal faction because of Shanti Bhushan

This is rubbish. Prashant Bhushan saying that can at best mean that he used it as an excuse. I don't, for a minute buy that Prashant Bhushan is incapable of making independent decisions. Even if he was, I fail to see how this is relevant to me.

Sanjay Singh, the hero

This comes as a surprise. Given that Sanjay Singh was publicly busy attributing all sorts of intentions to Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav, the idea that he was secretly negotiating an agreement - that too an agreement that involved Arvind Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav tendering a public apology sounds like a hallucination.

More likely, he got the Kejriwal faction to agree to it, but Prashant Bhushan did not buy. Probably provoked by using a known trigger - his father's name. Given Kejriwal's august views about Bhushan and Yadav, I am unable to comprehend why anyone fails to comprehend the refusal.

The mythical agreement

There is a description of an agreement to fulfill Prashant Bhushan's demands. This, in itself screams that it is not the interest of Aam Aadmi Party. These demands are old, unfulfilled. Even now, the party hardly seems interested in fulfilling them for itself. It seems to be more of a handout to the holdouts. I understand from this that now that the agreement is not happening, the demands no longer need to be fulfilled, because the Kejriwal faction apparently has no sense of ethics of its own.

Prashant Bhushan is right to bring up previously broken commitments. This does not speak of the party's interest in the reforms themselves, more like something they are willing to tolerate in order to shut up the spoilsports.

Would have been nicer if the party went for an agenda of reform independently of the fate of Bhushan and Yadav, but that seems too much to hope for. The party has changed, and does not seem to be interested in old goals without duress.

Where does this leave dissenters?

Dissenters are not a monolith. As I have remarked earlier, there are multiple goals among them. There are those who would simply like to see Kejriwal, Bhushan and Yadav to no longer be fighting. An agreement such as the one Atishi described would make them happy. That it failed will probably disappoint them, if there is any disappoint left in them after the last month.

For those insisting on procedure, the agreement was irrelevant completely - which is my disinterest in this letter as well. To follow procedure, the party does not need Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav to agree to anything. They need to take their allegations and proofs in front of their formal authority and go through whatever process required for establishing guilt or innocence and act on the basis of that.

Without following due process, even if Kejriwal and Bhushan-Yadav reach an agreement, at best what it would mean would be that they are fine with processes being bypassed as long as they are not excluded. Unless of course their removal was reversed as well - which is unlikely and probably unwise.

All that the letter achieves is to show that for all AAP's commitment to democracy, there are actually very few people who understand it or are interested in learning. I could have lived without this further confirmation, particularly from someone who had been considered intellectually sound so far.

But mostly, for all practical purposes, this letter has no impact on my assessment of the AAP crisis.

6

AAP volunteer Milan Gupta has filed an RTI with the Election Commission and obtained the National Council Members list that Aam Aadmi Party should have published on their website and has not. Milan Gupta has made the list public.

Milan Gupta, a worker of Aam Aadmi Party has released the National Council member list that Aam Aadmi Party has not put up on its website and is calling out to supporters of Aam Aadmi Party to urge them to attend the National Council meeting and strive to save the party from its imminent sabotage. His video explains his credentials in the party (since anyone raising questions is termed as a BJP agent these days) and his message. The list follows below.

Making the AAP National Council official list public:Volunteers reveal what the office hides. ( http://goo.gl/4BIsLG )
______________________________

1) First image: is a scan of reply received from Election Commission asking the names of persons who came together to form AAP and AAP's date of formation.

(You should know that Article IV-F-a of AAP constitution mentions that "All those who come together to form the Party and are present in the first meeting of the Party, shall form the first National Council of the Party.")

Reply received says: Date of formation is 24.11.2012 and the names of persons required are in 957 pages of records. It can be obtained on payment of Rs 1914/-.

2) Second image : is the bundle of 957 pages of certified records that I received from Election Commission today after the payment. You are free to inspect these records for yourself at my address.

3) http://goo.gl/4BIsLG : The list of National Council members culled out from these records is on this public link now. It contains 295 National Council members only.

These papers will also be kept in front of the venue of National Council meeting on 28th March for anyone to inspect.

Milan Gupta
306,Plot 39B, Santosh Apartments,
Sector 6, Dwarka,
New Delhi -75
Election Commission reply to Milan Gupta's RTI seeking list of Members of National Council
Election Commission reply to Milan Gupta's RTI seeking list of Members of National Council

List of names:

Name
Arvind Kejriwal
Pankaj Gupta
Krishna Kant Sevada
Yogendra Yadav
Shanti Bhushan
Yogesh Dahiya
Vishvas Kumar Sharma @ Dr Kumar Vishwas
Manish Sisodia
Prashant Bhushan
Naveen JaiHind
Kishor Asthana
Mehmood Khan
Shazia Ilmi
Surender Singh
Rahul Mehra
K K Niyogi
Surajit Das Gupta
Vinita Deshmukh
Ajit Jha
Gopal Rai
Sanjay Singh
Mayank Gandhi
Madhu Bhaduri
Tapan Misra
Sanjay Kansal
Hubung Payong
Somnath Bharti
Sharad Singh Kumre
Waman R More
Kamal Shrivastav
Dedhia Chandubhai
Pratyush Kumar
Deepak Sane
Shailendra Kushwaha
Ved Prakash Balryia
Preeti Sharma
Sanjay Babubhai Parmar
Sandeep Nagori
Indra Vikram Singh
Jai Prakash
Kiran Upkare
Ibrahin Alimuddin Khan
Subhash Ware
Shweta Agarwal
R C Pathak
Vilas Rajput
Yogesh Manikrao Kanekar
Savarkar Ambrish
Rajesh Kumar Pugliya
Devendra Chandrasen Wankhede
Prafful Vora
Vidyadhar doshi
Nidhi Chandresh Trivedi
Vithal L Satav
Dr. Girdhar S Patil
Chandrakant Suvama
Neeta Sukhatanker
Vijayshree Khanivadekar
Ravi P Srivastava
Thakar S Bhaviben
Akshay Hunka
Manju Jain
Jagdish Parmar
Prahlad Pandey
Vinay Kadam
Bipul Dey
Alpana Malik
Mohammad Azad
Arun Kumar
Chandra Kala
Rajender Pal
Gopal Mohan
Aruna Singh
Shimla Shri
Archana
Dr. Mahesh vikram Singh
Vishal Sharma
Yogesh Kumar
Gyanendra
Iliaz Azmi
Yogesh Kumar S/o Sh Anand
Vaibhav
Satyendra
Sudhir Bhardwaj
Araresh Bajpai
Gaya Singh
Amarendra
Omendra Bharat
Moolchand
Sharad Raghuvanshi
Mehek Singh
Neena Jain
Manoj S/o SoorajBahn
Dr. Prem S Pahari
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay
Ram Sumer
Dr. Atul Gupta
Cap. Srinivasalu Mekala
Pranjal Bordoloy
Anupama Sethy
Ratilal S Desai
Kishor N Desai
Parmar Pitambar
Mukesh Phoolchand Kothari
Gurpreet Singh Uppal
Sameer Sharma
Namrata Sharma
G Ranjith Kumar
Dr. R C Jaggi
Krishna K Solanki
Deep
Basant Hetamsariya
Rajendri w/o Tara Chand
Desh Raj
Sandeep Sandal
Salil Kumar
Hesamuddin Ansari
Dhiraj Kumar
Dharmendra Kumar
Anand Kumar
Suryadeb Pra Singh
Manjul Mayank Srivastava
Pradeep Kumar Singh
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Sunil Kumar Chipde
Neeraj Kumar
Rajendra Paswan
Ramnath Singh
Anup Singh
Rahul Gupta
Angesh Kumar
Gourav Singh
Sarita Singh
Kuldeep
Sushil Chauhan
Ruchika Manaktala
Ravi Shankar
Avinash Kumar Singh
Kuldeep Mudgil
Praveen Deshmukh
Maqsood Ul Hasan
Mohinder Goyal
Gobind Ram Choudhary
Shashi Kant Kumar
Shaleen Mitra
Madhuri Kashyap
Suryakant
Anil Kumar
Mohit Sharma
Shri Bhagwan
Kamlesh
Sakshi
Rajnish Verma
Neha
Munindra Singh
Satish Pandey
Ramniwas Gupta
Praveen Kumar Gupta
Narender Rathi
Sahajanand Rai
Rajesh Rishi
Omkar Shukla
Krishan Kumar Yadav
Jitendra Sharma
Nirupama Singh
Dimple Solanki
Bandana Kumari
Rajeev Kasewa
Ameek Ahmed
Dr. M. H. Ghazali
Rajesh Sharma
Asna Nausheen
Surinder Kumar
Devendra Sehrawat
Lenin
Praenjit Chakraborty
Harish Chandra Mane
Ajay Saxena
Ramesh Chandra
Anand Kumar Samal
Sayantan Panda
Narayan Manjhi
Diptiman Chattopadhyay
Chandra Mohan
Jahir Hussain
Upendra
Satish Sharma
Mohan Prasad
Rajesh Sharma
Narendra Singh
Christina Samy
Dhanada Kanta Mishra
Sumit Bhattacharjee
Prince Kumar Pathak
Krishna Moorthi
Harjot Singh Bains
Baljit Singh
Bhupendra Singh
Shahnaz Akhtar
Ramesh Kumar
Rajesh Jakhar
Dharam Veer Singh
Rajeev Godara
Lalit Kumar
Gurnaam Singh
Kuldeep Singh
Madan Puri
Ramjan
Sarita Oswal
Shankar Soni
Kirti Pathak
Gopi Lal
Prahlad Singh
Dr. Rakesh Parikh
Kuldeep
Prashant Kumar Ranasingha
Vijay Singh
Jafruddin
Sunil Agiwal
Ashok Talwar
Naveen Jeratha
Harinder Singh
Pawan Kumar
Ashawant Gupta
Shailendra Kumar
Ashok Kumar
Budha Nilesh Kumar
Naveen Kumar Mishra
Dalip Singh
Shivender Pratap Singh
Yusujaypehan Impiyakhan
Ratnesh Gupta
Rajesh Omprakash Mittal
Rajesh Mehta
Ashutosh Dutt
Ashish Garg
Anandaganeshan
Aravind Anand
Ashok Aggarwal
Anjali Damania
Avinish Sinha
Ankit Krishna Lal
Banamwar Sahu
Chegena Jee Chandra Sekhar
Dinesh Babulal Vaghela
Diwan Singh
Deepak Raj
Dilip Kumar Pandey
Durgesh Kumar
Gaurav Singh
Gunjan Kumar
Kuldeep
Kamaraj
Mamta Patra
Mangesh Dayaneshwar
Maruti Bhapkar
Manju Devi
Nishikant Mahapatra
Naresh Sharma
Naushar Ali
Naved
Narendra Kumar
Pawan Kumar
Pawan Kumar Pandey
Prithvi Reddy
Prabhakar Thyagrajan
Prashant
Praveen Kumar Gupta
Rahul Pandey
Ranjan Kumar Sahu
Rakesh Kumar Sinha
Raj Kumar Mishra
Sudesh Kumar Verma
Shailender
Subodh Sethi
Sanjeev Kumar Singh
Satish Pandey
Shyam Kumar
Sharwan Kumar
Sushil Kumar Kasyap
Siddhartha Sharma
Vinod Fotedar
Valmiki Nayak
Vipin Mittal
Vivek
Virendra Singh
Vandana
Vicky Sharma
Vikas Pandey
Laxman Singh
Manish Kumar
Abid Ullah Khan
Peeyush Nashine
Dinesh Mohaniya
Deepak Sarin

1

On the 4th of March, 2015, a meeting of the National Executive of the Aam Aadmi Party tabled accusations against Yogendra Yadav and Prashant Bhushan for anti-party activities and ended with a vote that saw them removed from the Political Affairs Committee. In my view, this decision was undemocratic and was arrived at in an unethical manner.

Reasons:

Allegations cannot be considered evidence

A letter making allegations cannot be considered evidence either. There was no independent investigation that resulted in any establishment of guilt. That the allegations were mischievous and factually problematic has been established by AAP volunteers alarmed by this development and specifically documented in this post on Saddahaq dedicated to explicitly addressing them.

[tweetthis twitter_handles="@Vidyut, @_AamJanata"]Allegations and conspiracy theories cannot be considered evidence.[/tweetthis]

Therefore the use of the allegations and avoidance of a factual investigation in order to remove Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav from the PAC indicates an unsubstantiated and malicious action against them.

Differences cannot be resolved by attacking one side

If there were differences between two camps, a due process to resolve them would address both sides of the divide. The allegations, in the absence of establishment of guilt amount to little more than that. Yet action was initiated only against Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav by those targeting them. Their attempt to call for a re-election of a PAC with irreconcilable differences was dismissed - which would be appropriate to do in the event of differences between equals in the leadership. It would empower the larger organization to have a say on such a crucial issue. It was rejected in spite of them offering to not contest to be on the PAC again - which would definitely mean that they were not attempting to avoid being removed. As with all their other suggestions available in the public domain, this would be congruent with the party's stated values of ground up democracy.

Mayank Gandhi put it in a nutshell:

I was taken aback by the resolution of removing them publicly, especially as they themselves were willing to leave. Also, this decision to sack them was against the overwhelming sentiments of volunteers from all over the world.

The vote that was taken was manipulated

The spokesperson for AAP RAjasthan,Rakesh Parikh has gone on record saying that while the state unit did not want the removal of Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav, AAP National Secretary had a representative of his choosing vote in the NE resulting in the opposite vote being cast.

"Since Rajasthan convener Ashok Jainji was unable to attend, he had nominated me to go and convey our position to the PAC. But Pankaj Gupta insisted that only Sunil Agiwal, a party member, can attend. As a state unit, we had wanted this vote to be avoided, and a proper investigation on charges against Bhushan and Yadav to be done by internal Lokpal Admiral Ramdas to ascertain if allegations against them were true. Only then should action have been initiated."

[...]

"All of those who joined AAP after victory in 2013 elections have grown more influential than those of us working for the last four years. People like Ashish Khetan and others have taken over the party,"

Rajasthan convener Ashok Jain confirmed to the Economic Times that a state resolution in favour of "postponing the PAC meeting to a later day was not heeded". Pankaj Gupta also confirmed that he had suggested Sunil Aigwal to represent the party.

[tweetthis twitter_handles="@Vidyut, @_AamJanata"]Manipulating votes is neither honest nor democratic[/tweetthis]

Additionally, members of the NE, who had moved the motion against Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav consulted with two members of the Delhi State AAP (Ashutosh and Ashish Khetan, both of whom had entered the party to assume important roles directly) who had been attacking Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav publicly before dismissing their very reasonable suggestions that would put them out of the PAC without harming the party's stated ethics. It is after this consultation that the vote targeting Prashant Bhushan was taken and this vote has caused irreparable damage to the Aam Aadmi Party's credibility as well as support base, as evidenced by official role holders speaking up against it as well as drastic drop in donations.

Is this enough evidence to set aside the vote because of rigging, and for action to be taken against those manipulating organizational decisions unethically? I doubt. AAP is defending this vote against all logic now.

Deliberate withholding of information from party volunteers

It is a little ironic that one of Prashant Bhushans key issues with transparency was the lack of a mechanism to incorporate views of volunteers into the party as well as lack of transparency in party decisions by not publicly posting minutes of meetings. It is ironic because at least two of the charges leveled against them would be confirmed or demolished if the minutes of meetings and tabled documents were available to volunteers. According to information posted by Saddahaq in the post linked above, minutes of the meeting that ended up with Kejriwal's often quoted "Let's go for broke" approving the contesting of elections nationwide would establish who exactly it was that made the suggestion, and whether the final approval came from Kejriwal or not. This is among key accusations agaonst Yogendra Yadav and Prashant Bhushan.

Yogendra Yadav is alleged to have submitted a document recommending contesting a mere 100 seats. This document is also not publicly available allowing spin masters to claim whatever they wish independently of factual proof or risk of verification - depending on whether the document is as claimed.

Additionally, minutes of the NE meeting that removed Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav from the PAC are also not available.

For a party that claims to be accountable, key decisions in the party being taken in an opaque manner and official gags issued to deny volunteers information is not just undemocratic, it is a deliberate violation of AAP's claimed ethics and constitution.

Misuse of official media channels to target individuals

In the absence of allegations being proved, all that is established is a one sided targeting of Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav, that they have not retaliated to at any point. On the other hand, abundant first hand accounts exist of AAP leaders going public to target both of them as well as official Social Media presence being misused by the faction attacking Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav.

Sanjay Singh and Anjali Damania interviews were broadcast on television channels are are publicly available videos. Ashish Khetan, Anjali Damania and more leveled accusations on Social Media - some of which were later deleted on seeing the anger of volunteers.

Below are two accounts of official members of AAP's social media team that demonstrate how AAP's social media was misused to create a perception that the entire organization was against the two, when in fact it was merely the hijacking of control of Social Media by one faction.

Priya is a member of AAP'sSocial Media team

Guys,

I am seeing a lot of back and forth emails debating, speculating and fighting between many well-intentioned volunteers. And I feel its not right on my part not to disclose what I know. I am a member of AAP social media team. And this is what happened in that group. (As Mayank Gandhi said, I will also be kicked out of the team soon. So be it )

Things were brewing since late December. Ankit and Abhinav (the social media leads) had stopped listening to most of the team members. I personally raised the issue of too much AK glorification stuff on our national page (before & after election), but all I got was arrogant replies from Abhinav & silence from Ankit.

On March 1st, Ankit posted on our group--"As directed by the National Secretary all page roles are being reshuffled". And he took out all of our admin privileges. There was an uproar in the group about this, but Ankit didn't care.

As soon as he did that, Ankit, Ashutosh, Ashish started tweeting against YY & PB. Most of us in the group raised our objection on what's going on. Ankit, simply ignored it.

On March 2nd--Abhinav posted Sanjay Singh's press conference. All of us raised our objection for using the AAP platform to take sides. We strongly told them to post YY's interview as well. The answer we got was that, "SS's press Conf is the party's stand & YY's interview is his personal stuff". All of us fought as much as we could, but Ankit simply ignored it completely.

In short, in my opinion, a VERY SMALL section of AAP core members misused their power and hijacked the platform to kick out two whistle blowers and tarnish their personal image. (Let me emphasis again, its just a handful of people. Their control on social media a reach of 15million people just made them look like a way larger crowd).

Personally I DO NOT know if this was done with AK's knowledge or not. I am not going to speculate that. But this incident clearly shows how easy it is for a VERY SMALL team of people to take control & hijack this great organization that we all worked together. So it is very important that democracy and transparency which is THE CORE message of AAP should be instilled within the party.

None of us can afford to leave the party at this juncture AAP because then AAP would become nothing but worse than BJP/RJD/Cong/SP. All our efforts for the last 2+ years would vanish. So it is very important to raise our voice and bring democracy and transparency within the party. I hope all of you would do that.

--
Regards
Priya James

Ankit Lal's letter briefing SM heads on specific accusations to be made against Yogendra Yadav and Prashant Bhushan.

Ankit Lal's letter directing AAP's Social Media team to level accusations against Yogendra Yadav and Prashant Bhushan while presenting them as opportunists
Ankit Lal's letter directing AAP's Social Media team to level accusations against Yogendra Yadav and Prashant Bhushan while presenting them as opportunists

This letter includes as "proof" a bogus sting operation conducted months ago and debunked thoroughly by SP Singh, another journalist present at the meeting where Yogendra Yadav allegedly planted stories in media against Arvind Kejriwal. The journalist puts that "proof" six feet under, but two points alone are adequate to demolish its credibility as an accusation.

  1. If media briefing was done to three journalists, how come only one published the information? The other two were too stupid to recognize a scoop when they received it in a specific off the record meeting?
  2. SP Singh had also received a call asking about his meeting with Yogendra Yadav, which asked him about the "planted" story and he had replied then itself that the journalist would have had other sources. So those doing the "sting" were clearly aware that the information had probably not come from Yogendra Yadav, yet see no hesitation to use it months later as "proof" to achieve their malicious agenda.

There is a letter by Shashank Kumar who has worked on the ground as well as designing the AAP Manifesto, Delhi Dialogue campaign and other graphics and design support. He contributed to the hashtag #UnitedAAP after being alarmed by AAP leaders viciously attacking Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav and seeing the toll it was taking on the cohesiveness of the party. The whole letter is well worth a read. It names AAP leaders acting to destroy the party from within and how. At no point does he claim that Prashant Bhushan or Yogendra Yadav are innocent, merely insists on a proper investigative process like the thousands of others infuriated by this witch-hunt playing out.

NRI volunteers had started the "ghanti bajao" campaign in the absence of a mechanism to register volunteer views, where volunteers called the members of the NE directly to express their displeasure over the factionalism. They had also recommended that the NE meeting be videotaped and the footage to be under the control of Admiral Ramdas to be made public if necessary in the event of a dispute. What is sad is that no one in the NE apparently has made a sting video. Would have cleared many things.

Admiral Ramdas on his part had seen this brewing and had written a letter warning against exactly this outcome.

All wisdom discarded, the faction targeting PrashantBhushan and Yogendra Yadav went ahead with their vendetta in the most dramatic manner possible ignoring even offered methods of doing it in a manner that would not harm Aam Aadmi Party.

And now those leaders are busy explaining how this was the right thing to do, and in their mythical Swaraj, the furious voices of supporters are just so much noise to be conned with mumbo-jumbo like "ardha satya" (half truth) or "anti-party activity" and to "wait" - clearly meaning wait for an answer you won't get, but hopefully your anger will be defused enough for us to bear no consequences. The gag on releasing information to volunteers who built the party remains, while mysterious allusions to information behind that iron curtain continue. Information that will miraculously turn an explicitly undemocratic process into something respectworthy, apparently.

Clearly the volunteers who have invested their faith in the values of the party are not listening. This isn't going to die down. "Swaraj will prevail, or AAP will finish," a volunteer declared passionately, exhorting me to "not give up on the party and only be angry with those who did wrong instead of the whole party."

 

1

Just got this urgent message from AAP volunteer @youth4justice (Kapil Mishra):

Is BJP planning a riot in Benares? Some Modi bhakts attacked a local Muslim volunteer and ran away raising slogans. Me, Ashutosh and Sanjay Singh still at thana (police station).

AAP volunteer Shafi ul Vara injured in attack by BJP thugs
AAP volunteer Shafi ul Vara injured in attack by BJP thugs

Shafi ul Vara was campaigning in Katehar, South Benares, when he was assaulted by BJP supporters who later left chanting hostile slogans. Shafi has a fractured arm. Ashutosh and Sanjay Singh are at the police station demanding that an FIR be filed for the attack, but so far the police have not filed one. Unclear why not.

Waiting for updates, but BJP does seem to be spoiling for a fight. Whether it is riot or political violence, both frequency and intensity of attacks on the rise.

Hope the police in Varanasi are up to the task or Varanasi may pay a heavy price for having caught Modi's eye. So far, the police have not filed an FIR.

Sanjay Singh and Ashutosh at police station demanding FIR
Sanjay Singh and Ashutosh at police station demanding FIR against the BJP thugs that assaulted AAP volunteer Shafi ul Vara.

Unclear why a police case is not being filed. The impunity with which BJP supporters can attack AAP itself tells how deeply entrenched the rot is.